A Clear Violation of Human Dignity and Fundamental Human Rights
In one of the latest and most flagrant examples of human rights violations in the Islamic Republic of Iran, judicial authorities in Isfahan Province have confirmed the execution of amputation sentences for two prisoners in the city’s central prison. The sentences, reportedly carried out based on charges of “hudud and ta’zir theft” as well as “deliberate damage and injury,” have sparked a wave of concern and condemnation from both domestic and international human rights organizations.
Behind the Judicial Curtain: Lack of Justice and Transparency
Asadollah Jafari, the head of Isfahan’s judiciary, confirmed in an interview with the media on Monday, June 9, 2025, that the sentences were executed following judicial proceedings and final approval by Iran’s Supreme Court. However, the lack of transparency in the trial process, the reported denial of access to legal counsel of the defendants’ choosing, and the use of punishments widely considered inhumane by the global community once again call into question the legitimacy and fairness of Iran’s judicial system.
Blatant Violation of International Treaties
The use of corporal punishment—particularly amputation—is in stark contrast to the fundamental principles of human dignity and directly contravenes multiple international human rights treaties, some of which Iran is a signatory to. Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights explicitly states:
“No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”
Similarly, Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)—which Iran signed in 1975—reiterates this prohibition. Thus, the continued use of punishments such as amputation, flogging, and stoning by the Iranian judiciary represents a direct breach of the country’s international obligations.
